<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Our Youth Voice &#187; Sociology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ouryouthvoice.com/?feed=rss2&#038;cat=12" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ouryouthvoice.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 03:05:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Relationships: Can&#039;t Have the Good, WITHOUT the Bad.</title>
		<link>http://ouryouthvoice.com/?p=542</link>
		<comments>http://ouryouthvoice.com/?p=542#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 22:51:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Snaps</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sociology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ouryouthvoice.com/?p=542</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We all know in relationships, there are ups, and there are downs. Fights, disagreements, arguments, ... you name it, it's all part of a relationship. If you think a relationship is all smiles and happy . . . <a href="http://ouryouthvoice.com/?p=542">[Continue Reading]</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We all know in relationships, there are ups, and there are downs. Fights, disagreements, arguments, &#8230; you name it, it&#8217;s all part of a relationship. If you think a relationship is all smiles and happy, it&#8217;s not a TRUE relationship (in my opinion). It&#8217;s the love AND the disagreements that make a relationship grow. Those petty arguments and disagreements show both members of the relationship what is really important to each other. You slowly learn what is worth being upset over, and what to let go. Basically, you have to choose your battles. To make a relationship work, grow, and be fully functional, I believe you have to go through hard times, so you appreciate the good times even more. Sure, you feel awful and miserable when you argue with your partner, but you know in the end if you truly love them, it brings you closer together.</p>
<p>&#8212;-Snaps</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ouryouthvoice.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=542</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Long Distance Relationships&#8211;should be a personal choice.</title>
		<link>http://ouryouthvoice.com/?p=527</link>
		<comments>http://ouryouthvoice.com/?p=527#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 18:01:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Snaps</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sociology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[long distance relationships]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ouryouthvoice.com/?p=527</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Many people say long distance relationships don't always last, and this is true, for the most part. Personally, I think people should respect those people in long distance relationships, instead of mocking them for their "stupidity" and "ignorance". I believe if two people love . . . <a href="http://ouryouthvoice.com/?p=527">[Continue Reading]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many people say long distance relationships don&#8217;t always last, and this is true, for the most part. Personally, I think people should respect those people in long distance relationships, instead of mocking them for their &#8220;stupidity&#8221; and &#8220;ignorance&#8221;. I believe if two people love each other, they have a right to be with eachother, no matter the distance. Granted there are exceptions such as age, etc, but distance shouldn&#8217;t matter. People in long distance relationships are really no different from those in close distance relationships.</p>
<p>I for one, am in a long distance relationship, and many people have told me I am &#8220;crazy&#8221;, or &#8220;stupid&#8221;, or &#8220;dumb&#8221; because I&#8217;m dating  someone in a different state. Those people who mock me or other people in the same situation as me are pretty much saying (in my opinion, of course) they can&#8217;t handle a long distance relationship, and so if THEY can&#8217;t handle it, then to them, it&#8217;s automatically ludacris. If you want to have a long distance relationship, I support it 100%.</p>
<p>&#8212;Snaps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ouryouthvoice.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=527</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Perspective &#8211; A Collection of Musings on the Nature of Humans</title>
		<link>http://ouryouthvoice.com/?p=487</link>
		<comments>http://ouryouthvoice.com/?p=487#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 20:23:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mmeyer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sociology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high school]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ouryouthvoice.com/?p=487</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don't know about any of you, but I often find myself thinking about the future and what it may look like. In a few short weeks, the school year will be over, and we'll all be moving up . . . <a href="http://ouryouthvoice.com/?p=487">[Continue Reading]</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know about any of you, but I often find myself thinking about the future and what it may look like. In a few short weeks, the school year will be over, and we&#8217;ll all be moving up a grade (may that be in high school, out of high school, or beyond). We&#8217;re not the same people we were when we started this great journey of life, and honesty, we&#8217;re not even getting warmed up yet. People change, that&#8217;s just in our nature, despite everything we do to try to stop it. This change comes at it&#8217;s own pace too, and this pace changes with who you talk to. No one is perfectly satisfied with their life, and they&#8217;ll tell you that. But time ultimately will come and wash all of these petty wishes away, leaving the ones that might actually have meaning.</p>
<p>This brings me to my first point: people ultimately want change. Even the happiest person on earth has something more they think might make them happy. This is just the way we are! There&#8217;s absolutely no use trying to hide it, deny it, or stop it. People living in poverty want riches, people living in riches wish they had a family. As much as they try to act like they don&#8217;t, do not be fooled. It&#8217;s perfectly okay to admit this. It&#8217;s a trait characteristic in every living organism &#8211; a desire to thrive. We don&#8217;t want to just live, we want to live comfortably (some more comfortably than others).</p>
<p>As we grow up, these desires and wishes are innocent and harmless. The new toy, to be able to play with siblings this very minute, so on, etc. When we get a bit older, however, and enter the dating scene, these desires may get a bit more scheming. Now we want him to be jealous that he left us, to get the grades that will allow us to go to the sparkling university of our dreams, avoid the overbearing eye of our parents. At each new stage, we realize the silly notions of the past level. We laugh them off without realizing that eventually the &#8220;cool&#8221;, new ideas we&#8217;re embracing now will soon become those we&#8217;re ridiculing of the past. For as long as high school seems, four years really aren&#8217;t long in the grand scheme of things, and the heartaches of the present will become the heartaches of the past.</p>
<p>People wonder why high school can be so hard. The truth of the matter is that this is the time where we&#8217;re discovering ourselves, our talents, our weaknesses, and our image of ourselves, and the only way to develop these ideas is to experience events that challenge our perception of our world. Like it or not, those events will sometimes hurt. How hard they hurt invariably depends on how you handle the situation. But I digress, how to handle painful situations is not the point of this article and shouldn&#8217;t be anyone other your decision.</p>
<p>Once we are adults and senior citizens, undoubtably we&#8217;ll look back and note these times with fondness, not remembering the pain and anxiety we once felt. Our desires will have changed to more reasonable goals. We hope to be able to pay bills, provide for families, and eventually not break our hips or need dentures. Even in age, humans tend to want <em>something </em>may it be material or otherwise. No matter how much of a conservative you are, there is still an amount of change that you wish to see take place in the world by the end of your lifetime.</p>
<p>So next time you feel upset about a particularly bad break-up, worried about your next job performance evaluation or AP European History exam that you really haven&#8217;t studied for just remember that eventually the waves of time will  caress the hurt of your heart and smooth out the pain, eventually eroding it to leave a peacefully blank space of sand for you to do whatever you wish with it.</p>
<p>-mmeyer</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ouryouthvoice.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=487</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pro-life Myths Debunked</title>
		<link>http://ouryouthvoice.com/?p=423</link>
		<comments>http://ouryouthvoice.com/?p=423#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 03:48:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>chelliejellie10</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sociology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pro-choice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pro-life]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ouryouthvoice.com/?p=423</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Unlike most teenage girls these days, I am one hundred percent pro-life. Although many of my friends have tried to make me see the light, this is one of the few beliefs I will probably never ever compromise. However, I have noticed that many pro-choicers have preconceptions that don’t apply to me at all, or a lot of other pro-lifers for that matter. Although the following statements . . . <a href="http://ouryouthvoice.com/?p=423">[Continue Reading]<a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal">Unlike most teenage girls these days, I am one hundred percent pro-life. Although many of my friends have tried to make me see the light, this is one of the few beliefs I will probably never ever compromise. However, I have noticed that many pro-choicers have preconceptions that don’t apply to me at all, or a lot of other pro-lifers for that matter. Although the following statements do apply to <em>many</em> pro-lifers, which is how these rumors got started in the first place, they definitely do not apply to <em>all</em>, and if you are radically pro-choice, this article will most likely not change your views on abortion itself, but hopefully it will enable you to see its opponents in a more positive light.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Myth #1: Everyone that is pro-life is a religious fanatic.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Several religions are against the termination of pregnancies, no matter what the circumstances. Although these religions do hold life sacred, this is also to prevent meaningless sex, because a person who really does not want to get pregnant will not have sex, according to their logic. However, I do not actually belong to any of these religions; I merely believe that ending a life to benefit oneself is murder, whether that life is a person one can’t stand or one’s unborn baby. These religions also happen to be against the usage of birth control. I am not; I am actually for birth control so that young women do not get into situations where they feel compelled to get an abortion. To me, the sexual activities one chooses to perform is completely up to her, and since birth control only stops life from being created and does not actually end a preexisting life, I encourage its practice.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Myth #2: Everyone that is pro-life is a prude, or someone who cannot get any.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Not true at all. Interestingly enough, nearly all of my virgin friends are pro-choice, while most of my sexually active friends are pro-life. This may seem like an impossible paradox, or that my friends are not representative of the general population, but it makes complete sense. The pro-choicers tend to be more ambitious and organized; therefore, a young pregnancy would be terrifying and goal-shattering to them. The pro-lifers, on the other hand, are more spontaneous and adaptable, so although a pregnancy would still be hard for them, they would be able to accept it and make arrangements for the child’s care that could still work with their lives. In my opinion, in order to be ready for sex, one does not necessarily need to <em>want </em>kids, but one does need to be willing to understand that it is possible that she will conceive. If one is mature enough to accept that, she will not need to get an abortion.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Myth #3: Everyone that is pro-life has no concept of how hard it is to take care of a child in bad circumstances.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Most people, no matter how privileged they are, have met at least one person who became pregnant before they should have. For me, this includes my grandmother, my mother, and my aunt, who were seventeen, nineteen, and fifteen, respectively. All of them chose to keep their children, although both my grandmother and aunt were in high school at the time. Despite this, my grandmother went on to be an English teacher, and my aunt managed to get her diploma and become a top Nissan saleswoman. Now, they never became brain surgeons, but they did manage to accomplish what they needed to and still had the blessings of their wonderful children. It was definitely a struggle for them, but they managed and the experience made them stronger and more appreciative of life. So if they can do it, then why can’t others? And if one is that worried about the child’s well-being in particular environments, there is still no need to terminate the pregnancy. It’s called adoption. And for those out there that believe that it is unfair to force a young girl to carry her child for nine months only to give it away, well, she really should have thought of that before she pulled down her pants.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Myth #4: Everyone that is pro-life wants to place restrictions on the freedom of choice.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Actually, pro-lifers are very much pro-choice, when it comes to the baby’s choice. The baby may be attached to the mother’s body, but he/she is still a separate entity, with his/her own soul and DNA that is fifty percent different from the mother’s. Why should the mother speak for the baby in whether or not he/she wants to live? The baby obviously wants to live, otherwise he/she would not be growing every second, developing in preparation for living outside of the mother’s womb. If one still wants to insist that a baby cannot possibly know what is best for him/her, then it should be pointed out that the baby’s father, the other fifty percent of the genes, has no say whatsoever in the child’s welfare. In fact, in the United States, it is legal for a married woman to get an abortion without her husband’s knowledge, let alone permission. The father has to give permission for all other surgical procedures performed on an infant, so why not abortion as well? If a man is noble enough to fight for his child’s life, he can take care of him/her himself, absolving the woman of any responsibility after she gives birth other than child support. Yes, she still has to carry the baby, but again, she should have thought of that.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Myth #5: Everyone who is pro-life is just trying to get the government more involved in everything.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">It has been very clear throughout history that making something illegal will not prevent it. For example, Prohibition in the 1920s only served to make alcohol more popular, and paved the way for organized crime. Even more relevant is the fact that abortions themselves used to be illegal, until the government realized how dangerous it was becoming for women to get abortions illicitly with unqualified, unsanitary surgeons. Therefore, I do not believe abortion should be outlawed, because it would change nothing. Instead, I am for promoting a greater awareness that infanticide is a morally disturbing act, and hoping that many mothers realize the value of their offspring.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Myth #6: Everyone who is pro-life lacks compassion for the poor little girls who were led astray.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">I hate to say this, but those girls are not that little if they decided to fool around with their boyfriends. Also, that boyfriend is not always the bad guy in these matters. Yes, there’s pressure and all that, but girls have hormones, too. Generally speaking, they want it too. And maybe they did not think about the consequences, but that is one of the tough things about life. Decisions cannot be undone. Although one might think abortion is a solution, it traumatizes the mother more than she realizes until the act is done. There are exceptions of course, but some mothers do miss their deceased children for the rest of their lives, especially when they finally do have families. I would never wish such a thing on someone, and this trauma can be prevented by not having an abortion. In this respect, pro-lifers are actually <em>more </em>compassionate, trying to protect the mother’s spiritual health so that she does not have to live with the burden of regret.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Myth #7: Everyone who is pro-life is old-fashioned and unwilling to conform to modern life.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Abortion is an ancient practice, dating back to at least Old Testament times, although practiced in many different cultures. Common methods included ingesting certain herbs and sticking objects up the cervix. Although giving birth is older than self-termination, abortion is not new enough to qualify as a modern phenomenon.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Now, if you were pro-choice and did not believe any of the above statements, then props to you for not being condemnatory. If you did, I hope you now recognize your error in judgment, and maybe even consider changing your mind about the abortion issue itself. Actually, I am probably kidding myself with that one, but maybe now you will try to look at the other side of an issue before labeling the enemy.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">
<p class="MsoNormal">&#8211;chelliejellie10</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ouryouthvoice.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=423</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>36</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Meal Time &#8211; Now Do We Want Supper Or Dinner?</title>
		<link>http://ouryouthvoice.com/?p=412</link>
		<comments>http://ouryouthvoice.com/?p=412#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 04:02:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>DarkAngel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sociology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dinner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[words]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ouryouthvoice.com/?p=412</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What is the difference between supper and dinner?  How about Coke, pop, or soda?  Why are so many words used for the same basic idea.  By definition dinner is the main meal of the day, eaten in the evening or at midday.  Where as Supper means . . . <a href="http://ouryouthvoice.com/?p=412">[Continue Reading]</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is the difference between supper and dinner?  How about Coke, pop, or soda?  Why are so many words used for the same basic idea.  By definition dinner is the main meal of the day, eaten in the evening or at midday.  Where as Supper means the evening meal, often the principal meal of the day. </p>
<p>So the only real difference is whichever sounds better.  Traditionally Dinner is used in the Northern states and &#8220;civilized&#8221; Midwestern cities.  It usually takes place around 5:30pm or 6:30 pm.  On farms it was closer to noon, since it was the main meal of the day. It is considered more of a sophistocated meal.</p>
<p>Supper on the other hand is used mainly in the south, taking place around nightfall and in a home surrounded by family. It is only called supper because in the south dinner is often used to replace the word lunch.  It would take place somewhere between 5pm and 9pm.  Supper is rarely considered the main meal of the day since it&#8217;s closer to bedtime.</p>
<p>So is there a proper way to announce the meal we eat last?  I have been scrutinized for saying dinner instead of supper&#8230; am I wrong?  Are they?  Should it matter when now the word lunch has become common around the entire United States? It&#8217;s hard to say what I feel about this.  It&#8217;s so strange how differnt parts of a country that claims to speak the same language can go around having multiple &#8220;right&#8221; words.. all for the same subject; coke, pop, soda; hare rabbit, bunny;supper,dinner;dinner,lunch; and so forth and so on.</p>
<p>Is there one correct word for any of these subjects? Or does the human race, especially the American race enjoy tormenting those new to the area because of a simple word made only to enhance the literature?</p>
<p>~<em>Dark Angel</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ouryouthvoice.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=412</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Facebook Stalking &#8211; Affecting our Social Awkwardness?</title>
		<link>http://ouryouthvoice.com/?p=407</link>
		<comments>http://ouryouthvoice.com/?p=407#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 04:38:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>alishasmoo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sociology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[texting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ouryouthvoice.com/?p=407</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We’ve all done it. You see someone you talk to from time to time, but have never ACTUALLY spoken words with. You look through all of their pictures, statuses, wall posts, etc. You become to KNOW them. Yet, once you actually see them in real, 3-D life, you pass by without so much as a glance or a word. Why is this? <a href="http://ouryouthvoice.com/?p=407">[Continue Reading]</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We’ve all done it.<span> </span>You see someone you talk to from time to time, but have never ACTUALLY spoken words with.<span> </span>You look through all of their pictures, statuses, wall posts, etc.<span> </span>You become to KNOW them.<span> </span>Yet, once you actually see them in real, 3-D life, you pass by without so much as a glance or a word.<span> </span>Why is this?</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Well, maybe it’s cause we’re awkward teenagers that have a new outlet to avoid conversation.<span> </span>Maybe it’s cause our curiosity is just too starved to ignore.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Or maybe it’s because we have some SERIOUS issues on the way.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Face-to-face communication is starting to suffer, greatly because of social networking sites and texting.<span> </span>Don’t get me wrong; I’m an avid texter/Facebook stalker, but I feel that interpersonal relationships have suffered because we all rely so much on communication via-electronics.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">And this is just the beginning. Soon, we’ll all be able to just THINK a thought and it’s automatically sent to Twitter for the world’s viewing pleasures.<span> </span>This idea may seem ridiculous, but it is more likely than not being cooked up by some Apple scientist, somewhere (yes, Apple, not Microsoft).</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Are we ready for this?</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">I’m sure as hell not.<span> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">So next time you see someone you love, give them a hug.<span> </span>Tell them you love them.<span> </span>Ask them about their day, as opposed to reading it later on your news feed.<span> </span>While our economy may be suffering with a side effect of inflation, personal relationships are suffering from deflation.<span> </span>A friendly hug is now worth MUCH more than it used to be.<span> </span>Take advantage.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">-alishasmoo</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ouryouthvoice.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=407</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stereotypes</title>
		<link>http://ouryouthvoice.com/?p=374</link>
		<comments>http://ouryouthvoice.com/?p=374#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 23:59:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mmeyer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sociology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stereotypes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theyouthvoice.scottwebsites.com/?p=374</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[People (especially teenagers) are exposed to stereotypes every day. They may not like it, but it's a fact of life. So what really is a stereotype? Webster's New World Dictionary defines a stereotype as, "a fixed or conventional notion or conception, as of a person, group, idea, etc., held by a number of people, and allowing for no . . . <a href="http://theyouthvoice.scottwebsites.com/?p=374">[Continue Reading]</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People (especially teenagers) are exposed to stereotypes every day. They may not like it, but it&#8217;s a fact of life. So what really is a stereotype? Webster&#8217;s New World Dictionary defines a stereotype as, &#8220;a fixed or conventional notion or conception, as of a person, group, idea, etc., held by a number of people, and allowing for no individuality.&#8221; This is extremely ironic when you consider that many of the groups being stereotyped (punk, emo, etc.) are trying to be intensely individual. However that is not the point. The point is:  each person is unique, and their special characteristics are what make up the whole of humanity.</p>
<p>People like to categorize other people they don&#8217;t know very well into tiny little groups with specific characteristics. This may be because humans have an inherent lust to &#8220;fit in&#8221; somewhere or because maybe we&#8217;re all just a little xenophobic. But whatever the cause, it results in these ridiculous groupings based off of next to no information. This is also why first impressions are worth so much however so often wrong. So if these generalizations aren&#8217;t accurate, on what are they formed?</p>
<p>Stereotypes may be formed from material items like clothes, or it may be how someone acts or the choices he or she makes. This is extremely prevalent in high school where teens create cliques and decide they need to be in the &#8220;right&#8221; clique &#8211; preps, jocks, whatever. However, these classifications are certainly not limited to high school. Adults group each other all the time but often to disastrous effects. While these categorizations may be partially correct, they don&#8217;t by any means tell the whole story. By stereotyping people into one group, any chance for them to be full, faceted human beings is completely eliminated.</p>
<p>If you use stereotypes, you are implying that anyone who is Irish must have a drinking problem, or anyone who is Asian is automatically a genius. While some of these are humorous and ennobling, most aren&#8217;t, and that&#8217;s why many people are extremely offended by them. Also, these ideas don&#8217;t leave any room for grey area in between. People are more than their race or economic situation. They are a little bit of you and a little bit of me and a whole lot of their own selves. No point in trying to suffocate them into meaningless strata.</p>
<p>- mmeyer</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ouryouthvoice.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=374</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friends: Bouncers or Comforters?</title>
		<link>http://ouryouthvoice.com/?p=316</link>
		<comments>http://ouryouthvoice.com/?p=316#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 22:56:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Snaps</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sociology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[friends]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theyouthvoice.scottwebsites.com/?p=316</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Friends are always there for us, whether it be good, or whether it be bad. Many people believe having a "good friend" is being able to ask them to do anything for them, and their friend will oblige. Personally, I don't believe this is true. Friends should always be there for us when . . . <a href="http://theyouthvoice.scottwebsites.com/?p=316">[Continue Reading}</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Friends are always there for us, whether it be good, or whether it be bad. Many people believe having a &#8220;good friend&#8221; is being able to ask them to do anything for them, and their friend will oblige. Personally, I don&#8217;t believe this is true. Friends should always be there for us when we are in a compromising situation, to comfort us, and make us feel better. This does not mean doing someone else&#8217;s &#8216;dirty work&#8217;.</p>
<p>If they get involved in a situation they don&#8217;t belong in, it could benefit poorly in their postion, as well as their friend who dragged them into the problem in the first place. I don&#8217;t believe friends should &#8220;go after&#8221; who ever messed with their friend, rather be there for that person and comfort them.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve learned this from experience that if you get involved in a situation that doesn&#8217;t concern you personally, you should simply keep your distance and stay loyal to your friends in a SAFE WAY. Being a &#8220;good friend&#8221; doesn&#8217;t necessarily mean you fix the problem yourself.</p>
<p>People have to fight their own battles, no matter how hard they are. A little help never harmed anyone, but getting involved is a different story, there is a very fine line dividing &#8220;helping out&#8221; and &#8220;getting involved&#8221;.  People never realize how strong they really are, until being strong is the only option they have.</p>
<p>Life unfortunately is a cruel thing, and it&#8217;s unfair and dealing with it can be very stressful, but  friends are there to ease the pain away from stress, not simply making it go away.</p>
<p>&#8211;Snaps</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ouryouthvoice.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=316</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What&#039;s the Deal with Weight?</title>
		<link>http://ouryouthvoice.com/?p=191</link>
		<comments>http://ouryouthvoice.com/?p=191#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2009 18:30:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>chelliejellie10</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sociology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[weight]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theyouthvoice.scottwebsites.com/?p=191</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Our society has many faults, but one I really don't understand is how the negative appearance, particularly concerning weight, is considered an acceptable and time-consuming topic of conversation . . . <a href="http://theyouthvoice.scottwebsites.com/?p=191">[Continue Reading]</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our society has many faults, but one I really don&#8217;t understand is how the negative appearance, particularly concerning weight, is considered an acceptable and time-consuming topic of conversation.</p>
<p>I hear it all the time. &#8220;Have you seen how fat she&#8217;s getting?&#8221;, &#8220;Jeez, he needs to get a bra for his manboobs&#8221;, and &#8220;She&#8217;s too skinny.  I bet she never eats&#8221; are commonly phrases used to poke fun at someone, and I personally find it disgusting.  It&#8217;s time that this kind of superficial categorization is stopped.</p>
<p>First of all, how is talking about someone&#8217;s weight even interesting?  Yeah, maybe being anorexic or obese is unhealthy and not particularly attractive, but why the duration of the discussion is longer than two seconds is a mystery to me.  Is someone who feels a compulsive need to criticize the appearance of others simply such a boring person that they have to attack others in order to come up with a topic to talk about at all?  If not, then why not discuss something else?  There&#8217;s plenty of topics out there that are more relevant.  To me, even gossipping about that one girl that hooked up with that one basketball player is more mature than talking about weight.  At least the former actually reflects on who the person is, even if it the content may distort the truth.</p>
<p>Which brings me to the second point.  How does someone&#8217;s physical appearance show who they are on the inside?  Believe it or not, some people actually believe that those with a healthier weight have better personalities than their over or underweight counterparts.  Overweight people are stereotyped as lazy while underweight people are said to be overconforming to society.  This is not always true.  Body shape is strongly correlated with genetics, and sometimes there is not a lot someone can do to change it.  If a person is genuinely nice, then who really cares?  It&#8217;s not your body, so don&#8217;t judge it.  And by the way, you really don&#8217;t have to check it out. No one is forcing you to stare at anyone&#8217;s cellulite.  Even if they&#8217;re wearing short shorts, you can still look elsewhere, maybe into their eyes, where most people prefer you look anyway.</p>
<p>And if that isn&#8217;t enough to convince you, think of how the person talked about feels.  He/she is probably already really self-conscious about themselves, and they don&#8217;t need you to rag on them even more.  How would you feel if you overheard people criticize you for something as trivial as your body shape?  Not so good, right?</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not even just preteen girls that do it.  It&#8217;s guys, girls, men, women of all ages.  It&#8217;s universal, but if you happen to be one of the few that refuse to participate in this superficial trend, then <em>kudos to you.</em></p>
<p>In conclusion, next time you run out of topics to discuss, try talking about somthing that doesn&#8217;t make fun of someone else.  There&#8217;s so much more variety in that category, and I&#8217;m sure you&#8217;ll find that they&#8217;re much more fun to discuss anyway.</p>
<p>-chelliejellie10</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ouryouthvoice.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=191</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Religulous &#8211; A Hilarious Example of Freedom of Speech, or the Worship of Obnoxiousness?</title>
		<link>http://ouryouthvoice.com/?p=112</link>
		<comments>http://ouryouthvoice.com/?p=112#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 00:51:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>chelliejellie10</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sociology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom of speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movie reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[religulous]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theyouthvoice.scottwebsites.com/?p=112</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Perhaps some of you have seen the new documentary, Religulous, featuring Bill Maher. For those people who have not and possibly never will, the plot consists of Maher interviewing various devout believers of major religions, showing how ridiculous their beliefs . . . <a href="http://theyouthvoice.scottwebsites.com/?p=112">[Continue Reading]</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal">Perhaps some of you have seen the new documentary, <em>Religulous</em>, featuring Bill Maher. For those people who have not and possibly never will, the plot consists of Maher interviewing various devout believers of major religions, showing how ridiculous their beliefs supposedly are, and making a huge point of displaying how they sometimes cannot come up with a smart-alecky answer to his philosophical questions.  For atheists and agnostics, this is supposed to be the epitome of humor, guaranteed to have them rolling on the floor laughing.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">However, my question to you is this: why would anyone consider denigrating the belief system people have had their whole lives comical?  To me, and several others, it was an example of blatant disrespect to the majority of people on this planet who happen to have a faith in a higher being.  Is someone really “stupid” just because they were taught from birth that certain things occur a certain way because of a certain metaphysical deity?  Are they “ludicrous” because they can look beyond society and see the divine beauty of the universe in a way that cannot really make sense to someone who has not had the same kind of religious teaching they did?</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Ironically, my religious views and Maher’s are actually in sync.  I, like him, choose not to be affiliated with a large, organized denomination and constantly question the existence of a higher power.  However, my answer is a firm, confident “No.”  Why should anyone have the right to label others idiots simply because he refuses to see the other side of the story?  Especially since he is actually in the minority, and not the majority.  How does Maher know, exactly, that he isn’t the idiot in this situation?  Now, I’m not saying he doesn’t have the right to judge others, because in a country like America, he obviously does.  He can poke fun at people he doesn’t agree with when he’s hanging out with his friends as much as he wants.  We all do it.  But to go up to people, filming them while trying to prove how &#8220;low&#8221; their intelligence is, and then proclaiming he has produced a comedy, is completely uncalled for.  What good, exactly, does it do for him to harass others about something that brings them comfort?  Absolutely nothing.  It’s disgusting.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Everyone has their opinions, and no one will ever agree on everything with everyone they meet.  That’s normal, and it’s perfectly understandable if one side lacks facts to maybe politely explain them.  But opinions should be respected, not made jokes out of.  In fact, I strongly encourage listening carefully to the explanations of the other side.  After all, what if you’re wrong?  Wouldn’t you like to quietly accept that rather than be humiliated in homes all over the world?  Honestly.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">&#8211;chelliejellie10</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ouryouthvoice.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=112</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
