Perhaps some of you have seen the new documentary, Religulous, featuring Bill Maher. For those people who have not and possibly never will, the plot consists of Maher interviewing various devout believers of major religions, showing how ridiculous their beliefs supposedly are, and making a huge point of displaying how they sometimes cannot come up with a smart-alecky answer to his philosophical questions. For atheists and agnostics, this is supposed to be the epitome of humor, guaranteed to have them rolling on the floor laughing.
However, my question to you is this: why would anyone consider denigrating the belief system people have had their whole lives comical? To me, and several others, it was an example of blatant disrespect to the majority of people on this planet who happen to have a faith in a higher being. Is someone really “stupid” just because they were taught from birth that certain things occur a certain way because of a certain metaphysical deity? Are they “ludicrous” because they can look beyond society and see the divine beauty of the universe in a way that cannot really make sense to someone who has not had the same kind of religious teaching they did?
Ironically, my religious views and Maher’s are actually in sync. I, like him, choose not to be affiliated with a large, organized denomination and constantly question the existence of a higher power. However, my answer is a firm, confident “No.” Why should anyone have the right to label others idiots simply because he refuses to see the other side of the story? Especially since he is actually in the minority, and not the majority. How does Maher know, exactly, that he isn’t the idiot in this situation? Now, I’m not saying he doesn’t have the right to judge others, because in a country like America, he obviously does. He can poke fun at people he doesn’t agree with when he’s hanging out with his friends as much as he wants. We all do it. But to go up to people, filming them while trying to prove how “low” their intelligence is, and then proclaiming he has produced a comedy, is completely uncalled for. What good, exactly, does it do for him to harass others about something that brings them comfort? Absolutely nothing. It’s disgusting.
Everyone has their opinions, and no one will ever agree on everything with everyone they meet. That’s normal, and it’s perfectly understandable if one side lacks facts to maybe politely explain them. But opinions should be respected, not made jokes out of. In fact, I strongly encourage listening carefully to the explanations of the other side. After all, what if you’re wrong? Wouldn’t you like to quietly accept that rather than be humiliated in homes all over the world? Honestly.
–chelliejellie10

Due to your personal opinions, you should watch Ben Stein interview one of the biggest atheists, Richard Dawkins. There are short clips on youtube that are just as hilarious. (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GlZtEjtlirc)
Ben Stein. Making Richard Dawkins. Look ridiculous. So both sides have people who aren’t exactly the best at being hardballed by some people. They can write the most well-versed books but when it comes to quick questions, you can mess things up.
Besides, Religulous really aimed at making fun of rednecks in the bible belt, which is obviously not the best place to go to see the most knowledgeable in the field.
Haha like I said I’m not religious, but I may have given off that impression. I simply have a lot of respect for religious people because most of my family is very Catholic, and they’re relatively intelligent people, just different. I actually think being religious or not has a lot to do with innate factors such as personality, but not really so much IQ. Some people like the idea of being protected by an outer force, and see divine beauty in the world, and believe good is rewarded in the end, and some people are too analytical and question everything. Neither is bad, just different. And isn’t America supposed to be all about acceptance?
But that is a pretty funny video. Thanks for sharing.
no, you obviously exuded an atheistic point of view, but I figured I’d show you the other side as well. Richard Dawkins is regarded by some to be the “Father of Athiesm” although I’ve honestly heard better arguments for Atheism from high school students….but I figured I’d show you Ben Stein at his finest, because he’s my hero =D
Well, I really tried to make the article more about respecting others’ opinions than the fundamental question of religion itself. That’s why I didn’t really explore all the different aspects. So my philosophy is if people have the facts, let them believe what they want to believe.
But I’m pretty sure I’ll never write an article about religion itself. Too long and extensive and complicated and controversial. But if you want to try, by all means go ahead, because it sounds like you have some good opinions =)
I think the movie would have been offensive if he had said it was not a comedy. Because that is exactly what it was. He found unintelligent religious people and made fun of there stupidity. Yes it was like shooting ducks in a barrel but at least he didn’t try to say the movie seriously addressed anything. It was a religious streetsmarts episode and as usual the American public proved to be idiots. The same movie could be made about atheists I could name a handful that are as ignorant as they get. I’m what would be considered a very religious and the movie didn’t offend me at all, there are unintelligent people in both camps and that as no bearing on the belief structures themselves.
ahhhh….how nobody could know what Christmas actually was….at work….was…eye-opening.
Saw the movie, thought it was very funny.