Unlike most teenage girls these days, I am one hundred percent pro-life. Although many of my friends have tried to make me see the light, this is one of the few beliefs I will probably never ever compromise. However, I have noticed that many pro-choicers have preconceptions that don’t apply to me at all, or a lot of other pro-lifers for that matter. Although the following statements do apply to many pro-lifers, which is how these rumors got started in the first place, they definitely do not apply to all, and if you are radically pro-choice, this article will most likely not change your views on abortion itself, but hopefully it will enable you to see its opponents in a more positive light.
Myth #1: Everyone that is pro-life is a religious fanatic.
Several religions are against the termination of pregnancies, no matter what the circumstances. Although these religions do hold life sacred, this is also to prevent meaningless sex, because a person who really does not want to get pregnant will not have sex, according to their logic. However, I do not actually belong to any of these religions; I merely believe that ending a life to benefit oneself is murder, whether that life is a person one can’t stand or one’s unborn baby. These religions also happen to be against the usage of birth control. I am not; I am actually for birth control so that young women do not get into situations where they feel compelled to get an abortion. To me, the sexual activities one chooses to perform is completely up to her, and since birth control only stops life from being created and does not actually end a preexisting life, I encourage its practice.
Myth #2: Everyone that is pro-life is a prude, or someone who cannot get any.
Not true at all. Interestingly enough, nearly all of my virgin friends are pro-choice, while most of my sexually active friends are pro-life. This may seem like an impossible paradox, or that my friends are not representative of the general population, but it makes complete sense. The pro-choicers tend to be more ambitious and organized; therefore, a young pregnancy would be terrifying and goal-shattering to them. The pro-lifers, on the other hand, are more spontaneous and adaptable, so although a pregnancy would still be hard for them, they would be able to accept it and make arrangements for the child’s care that could still work with their lives. In my opinion, in order to be ready for sex, one does not necessarily need to want kids, but one does need to be willing to understand that it is possible that she will conceive. If one is mature enough to accept that, she will not need to get an abortion.
Myth #3: Everyone that is pro-life has no concept of how hard it is to take care of a child in bad circumstances.
Most people, no matter how privileged they are, have met at least one person who became pregnant before they should have. For me, this includes my grandmother, my mother, and my aunt, who were seventeen, nineteen, and fifteen, respectively. All of them chose to keep their children, although both my grandmother and aunt were in high school at the time. Despite this, my grandmother went on to be an English teacher, and my aunt managed to get her diploma and become a top Nissan saleswoman. Now, they never became brain surgeons, but they did manage to accomplish what they needed to and still had the blessings of their wonderful children. It was definitely a struggle for them, but they managed and the experience made them stronger and more appreciative of life. So if they can do it, then why can’t others? And if one is that worried about the child’s well-being in particular environments, there is still no need to terminate the pregnancy. It’s called adoption. And for those out there that believe that it is unfair to force a young girl to carry her child for nine months only to give it away, well, she really should have thought of that before she pulled down her pants.
Myth #4: Everyone that is pro-life wants to place restrictions on the freedom of choice.
Actually, pro-lifers are very much pro-choice, when it comes to the baby’s choice. The baby may be attached to the mother’s body, but he/she is still a separate entity, with his/her own soul and DNA that is fifty percent different from the mother’s. Why should the mother speak for the baby in whether or not he/she wants to live? The baby obviously wants to live, otherwise he/she would not be growing every second, developing in preparation for living outside of the mother’s womb. If one still wants to insist that a baby cannot possibly know what is best for him/her, then it should be pointed out that the baby’s father, the other fifty percent of the genes, has no say whatsoever in the child’s welfare. In fact, in the United States, it is legal for a married woman to get an abortion without her husband’s knowledge, let alone permission. The father has to give permission for all other surgical procedures performed on an infant, so why not abortion as well? If a man is noble enough to fight for his child’s life, he can take care of him/her himself, absolving the woman of any responsibility after she gives birth other than child support. Yes, she still has to carry the baby, but again, she should have thought of that.
Myth #5: Everyone who is pro-life is just trying to get the government more involved in everything.
It has been very clear throughout history that making something illegal will not prevent it. For example, Prohibition in the 1920s only served to make alcohol more popular, and paved the way for organized crime. Even more relevant is the fact that abortions themselves used to be illegal, until the government realized how dangerous it was becoming for women to get abortions illicitly with unqualified, unsanitary surgeons. Therefore, I do not believe abortion should be outlawed, because it would change nothing. Instead, I am for promoting a greater awareness that infanticide is a morally disturbing act, and hoping that many mothers realize the value of their offspring.
Myth #6: Everyone who is pro-life lacks compassion for the poor little girls who were led astray.
I hate to say this, but those girls are not that little if they decided to fool around with their boyfriends. Also, that boyfriend is not always the bad guy in these matters. Yes, there’s pressure and all that, but girls have hormones, too. Generally speaking, they want it too. And maybe they did not think about the consequences, but that is one of the tough things about life. Decisions cannot be undone. Although one might think abortion is a solution, it traumatizes the mother more than she realizes until the act is done. There are exceptions of course, but some mothers do miss their deceased children for the rest of their lives, especially when they finally do have families. I would never wish such a thing on someone, and this trauma can be prevented by not having an abortion. In this respect, pro-lifers are actually more compassionate, trying to protect the mother’s spiritual health so that she does not have to live with the burden of regret.
Myth #7: Everyone who is pro-life is old-fashioned and unwilling to conform to modern life.
Abortion is an ancient practice, dating back to at least Old Testament times, although practiced in many different cultures. Common methods included ingesting certain herbs and sticking objects up the cervix. Although giving birth is older than self-termination, abortion is not new enough to qualify as a modern phenomenon.
Now, if you were pro-choice and did not believe any of the above statements, then props to you for not being condemnatory. If you did, I hope you now recognize your error in judgment, and maybe even consider changing your mind about the abortion issue itself. Actually, I am probably kidding myself with that one, but maybe now you will try to look at the other side of an issue before labeling the enemy.
–chelliejellie10

Thank you for placing a logical and leveled headed argument for the pro-life movement. And though I am against for religious reasons, there are valid secular and universal reasons against abortions. I especially agree with, “The baby may be attached to the mother’s body, but he/she is still a separate entity”. Thank you for giving the choice of the baby a say at the table of abortion. I would have to disagree with your point that the government should not step in and protect the rights of fetuses. During the Civil Rights Movements, federal troops were sent in to protect the Constitution rights for black students to be given an equal education; just as the government must step in and protect a baby’s Constitutional right to not have life, liberty, and property deprived without due process of law. And I’ve never seen a fetus being issued a Writ of Habeas corpus. I would like to conclude my review by thanking you again for giving a reasonable voice to the pro-life point of view.
You’re welcome. I would very much like for the government to be able to step in to protect these children, but the reason I am not pushing for it is, as I mentioned, the fact that women will find ways to do it illegally, just as they did before abortion was legal. Unless I guess the government made it a felony to perform an abortion, rather than a misdemeanor. Then maybe we’d see some results. Hm, doesn’t sound like a bad idea, actually. First degree murder is a felony, and that’s basically what abortion is. Good point, Stephen17.
though I can understand some people would think those things, no one I know thinks any of that about Pro-life people. Us pro-choicers understand they just think its wrong.
As far as the baby wanting to be born, your evidence isn’t very compelling. A baby grows inside of its mother because thats the just what happens. The baby isn’t capable of concious thought so it can’t make a choice, nor is it educated enough to know the difference between life and death. That’s why I have no qualms about abortions. I think its a woman’s choice and that the embryo isn’t really alive until the third trimester because at that point its just kind finishing things up. Everything is developed; just growing.
that’s just me though
plus comparing a baby to the civil rights movement is a bit ridiculous don’t think? The people who were suffering were actually legally born in that case.
A baby has a heart beat within two weeks of conception.
so? does it have a brain?
If it doesn’t have a brain, that means the heart is.. pointless?
no, but a lot of animals have hearts. And yes, they all of brains, but none like ours. Our brains are what makes us humans, not our hearts.
Heh I believe this is about human-rights, not animal rights.
I would recommend not bringing up animal rights with a vegetarian.
lol…that wasn’t my point AT ALL.
Humans are human because of their superior brain, not because they have a heart beat. That is exactly why a fetus has no rights because its not human
So there are no such thing as “fetus-rights,” if you must?
no, not at all. They aren’t covered in the consitution or any other document like that. plus, people ARE given rights. Like I said, after a certain point I believe an abortion is wrong, but if you do it quickly (1st to early 2nd tri) then its fine.
Sooo if a person somehow manages to kill a fetus without harming the woman, there is no loss?
its subjective. If the woman wanted the baby, then yes, there is a loss. Or the husband for that matter too. But if I just read about it in the newspaper I would say “well, that’s unfortunate, but at least the woman is okay”.
Thats why this arguement is subjective, and thats why there has to be up to the person. You can’t just say its wrong.
I can’t?
well you can, but you can’t (you being the government) enforce legislation banning it. Because its a subjective arguement, it should be legal.
This is ridiculous. Why is it necessary for people to push personal opinions into the law. Can’t they just be reasonable and keep personal matters into their own hands. Not make a choice for everyone.
Right now the government is leaning towards forcing the pro-choice movement. So I don’t think that’s fair either? See the article comments for what I’m talking about.
no…because by making it legal, the people that don’t like it don’t have to have it done, and the people that want it can get it.
the Pro-life way makes it so that no one can have it. Pro-choice doesn’t force anything. that’s why its a CHOICE.
I have been keeping updated on the comments. This is America. It only makes since that our government is leaning that way. All people should have the right to choice what they want.
^win
Hmm This is America. The country that was established by Christianity. The country under God.
Aborted fetuses go to heaven faster, right?
Oh wait, I forgot that they’re going to hell because all humans are born with sin, even though they’ve never done anything. All because that silly rib woman consumed a fruit a talking snake told her to.
Ah, the wonders of Christianity.
lol, that’s just ignorant. Just because you’re christian doesn’t give you the final say. I’m Jewish and I have just as much say as you do.
Also, I find it ironic that whereas one of the points brought up in the article was that “not all pro-life people are religious fanatics”. Not saying you’re FANATIC but the fact that you can’t have a civilized arguement without saying “I WIN CUZ I’M CRISTIEN” is a bit disapointing.
Also, “under God” was added to the pledge to unify idiots scared of communism in 1954. That’s not how the Pledge of Allegiance was originally written. Also, we’re secular, and it’s an utter shame that faith has plagued our democracy.
“ThatOneGuy” and “FRUIT” both have the wrong idea about this whole shpeal.
ThatOneGuy, this nation was formed specifically for the purpose of religious freedom. Well, a lot of other stuff factored into it, but that’s how it goes. So quiet, you.
FRUIT, you’re just as arrogant on the concept as ThatOneGuy. You one of those people who reads the first few pages of Genesis, reads a Richard Dawkins book, and suddenly believe you know everything about Christianity. And it’s evident that you don’t know the first thing about that religion. So quiet, you.
Also, THINK said, “This is America. It only makes since that our government is leaning that way. All people should have the right to choice what they want.”
Let me quote the article, which you apparently didn’t read.
“Myth #4: Everyone that is pro-life wants to place restrictions on the freedom of choice.
Actually, pro-lifers are very much pro-choice, when it comes to the baby’s choice. The baby may be attached to the mother’s body, but he/she is still a separate entity, with his/her own soul and DNA that is fifty percent different from the mother’s.”
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.
“quiet, you”
mmm….still, I don’t think the baby can make an educated choice. I don’t support wanton aborotions but if the mother really can’t support a kid, then I think its perfectly fine
First off I’ll clear one comment. Under God was not added because of communists, the entire pledge was, however that has no bearing on the article at hand.
Secondly this country was founded to promote religious freedom is partially correct. It was settled for that reason, but founded because of representation issues.
Thirdly, the article was not about the ethical dilemma of abortion but rather about the pro-life stereotype.
And lastly fall92 is correct in that you shouldn’t try and make religions that you dont know anything about look ridiculous, because you are the one that ends up looking stupid.(Case in point Richard Dawkins)
I’ll admit, I’m no Christian scholar. But it doesn’t take much to look at the first few pages of Genesis and see how ridiculous it is.
“You one of those people who reads the first few pages of Genesis, reads a Richard Dawkins book, and suddenly believe you know everything about Christianity. And it’s evident that you don’t know the first thing about that religion. So quiet, you.”
You realize the majority of these people were raised to be a Christian.
You realize raised Christian and actually knowing something about Christian theology is totally different. You can’t just read Genesis in the NIV translation and think you know something. You’ve forgotten Hebrew root words, genre,author historical context, an a dozen other factors. Christianity is simple but understanding the totality of the revelation of God is not.
Okay. Then please help me understand the “totality of the revelation of God” Since its so very complex.
I wouldn’t claim to know it all. And there is no way I could walk you through the bible on this website. But systematic theology books are available at most books stores. Although again I don’t think anyone would make the claim to fully understand the Word of God. If you have something specific id love to address it, just not on this website. Since that would be unfair to the writer of this article.
wow, i saw this title to this topic and went “oh, man, i see many comments to come…” and i wa quite right.
i’d like to explain my personal position on this whole thing, but i’m not very good with explaining it in a way that makes sense to everyone. i’ll just pull out one word….
ADOPTION
I think that adoption is always an available choice if you can’t commit to abortion, but don’t want to have the child.
But sometimes I can’t help but think that leaving a child with unknown parents and not caring for them is the same or worse than abortion, it’s still a pretty sorrowful choice.