Tag Archive: Video Games


Rock Band or Guitar Hero?

Rock Band and Guitar Hero might seem very similar at a first glance, but when you take a closer peak you might reconsider that.

Rock Band is made by a company called HARMONIX that used to make Guitar Hero until they left them and started Rock Band. To me, this was a good decision even though some might not agree. So which music game is better to jam with? Rock Band.  Rock Band is the first game to have drums as a peripheral in a music video game and Guitar Hero followed that. Rock Band is a step ahead because they were the first to create this drumset and there are many complaints of the Guitar Hero drumset, but not many with the Rock Band set. A great thing about the Rock Band set is the fact you can custumize the drum set by adding a second foot pedal and cymbals. Guitar Hero doesnt have this, which means you pretty much just get what is given. Still, on the subject of the drumset, if your pedal snaps, you just send it back and you are given a new one in the mail for free. This problem, however, should rarely happen now because the new Rock Band drum set has a pedal that is made of metal and not plastic, unlike Guitar Hero: World Tour, which is plastic. Another great thing, is the song lists on both Rock Band 1 and Rock Band 2 are killer! Guitar Hero: World Tour has a great set list as well, but i think Rock Band 2′s song list covers a more vast spanned of music. Finally, the one thing that pretty much ensures that Rock Band is ahead is the fact that HARMONIX somehow manages to produce many new song EVERY WEEK that are downloadable over the PSN or XBOX LIVE. These tracks do cost money, but not a lot and they are occasionally free. Guitar Hero has downloadable songs as well, but they don’t have new songs every single week like Rock Band does.

In the end, however, I believe Rock Band overcomes by a slight margin. This slight margin includes a variety of things from songs to the peripherals. I find Rock Band more enjoyable over the time period of me owning both Rock Band & Guitar Hero.

Spend the extra money and get Rock Band. You will be glad you did!

-jsussman

In this world, everything is becoming simpler and simpler, stupider and stupider; constantly being dumbed down. Music, movies, television, literature—it is all becoming more basic and more cliché. But nothing suffers more from this plague of unoriginality than video games.

Almost all popular video games these days are the same thing: Simplistic shooters with no good story or characters, no underlying message; nothing. It’s a shame that such dull and mindless games constantly get good reviews. Most shooter games follow the same formula of war between two races, countries, or planets where you go through each level shooting astoundingly dumb enemies.

A perfect example of games becoming more simplistic is Halo Wars. The game strays from the path of real time strategy games where you plan out your fight, and skillfully judge where to place your buildings and resources to just spawning forces until the other side dies! Not only that, but it perfectly uses the famous name of the Halo series and the lure of new maps for Halo 3 in its advertising, assuring the game high sales from the mindless consumers.

If there is any recurring theme in video games these days, it’s the absurdly boring protagonists. They’re all the same now, a big tough bald (or just shaven head) guy, often a space marine, fighting in an army, or as a mercenary. If you’re lucky, the protagonist gets a dark past to go with his super muscular simplicity. Good examples would be the leads of many games: the Gears of War series, Halo Wars, Chronicles of Riddick, Prototype, Mass Effect, Army of Two, Crysis, Kane and Lynch, Grand Theft Auto 4, STALKER, Hitman, Too Human, Resistance: Fall of Man, God of War, Fracture, Star Wars: Force Unleashed, and many others. Why are developers so scared to stray from this overly done lead?

Another thing abundant in games is the terrible environments. It’s always brown, grey, olive, and black now. Supposedly it’s “realistic,” but all I’m seeing are dull colors. The war zones, are often post apocalyptic settings, now with cover thrown about that just happens to be perfectly sized for any soldier crouching down; a seemingly great contribution to the games of today from the Gears of War games. Even one of my favorite games, Fallout 3, suffers from the brown syndrome, For whatever reason, you can always find dusty looking snowflakes falling in the air in these games too. I may sound like a nostalgic loser saying this, but whatever happened to all the vibrant games from just a few years ago?

Just several years ago, everyone complained about all of the WWII shooters, and playing as Joe Everyman the infantry soldier, but now we’ve just moved onto the newer games and ideas that are rehashed again and again. I surely hope that original games that stray from the norm like Okami, Mad World, Katamari Damacy, No More Heroes, Portal, Flower, Shadow of the Colossus, and the Mother series will keep being created, or I will lose all interest in games. Sure all the monotonous shooter games can be fun, but it’s pathetic that they are constantly heralded with high reviews.

-FRUIT

Fallout 3

Fallout 3 is for the PS3 and the Xbox 360. It is a HUGE adventure game. If you have ever played Oblivion than you would agree with me when I say that Fallout is the same as Oblivion, but with guns. The game takes place in a post-apocalyptic Washington D.C., although most of the environment looks like the 80′s. Most of the people survived by going into these safe houses called vaults.  The vaults were big underground systems made up of rooms for the residents and everything else that is needed to survive for long periods of time. You play as the son or daughter of a great scientist named James (I am not naming him after me, thats his name =P). Your mother dies in labor in the beginning of the game. Your father eventually escapes the vault, and you have to try to find him. I won’t say much else about the gameplay because I don’t want to spoil the game for you =P.

The game has a lot of unique characteristics that makes it different from most other games. For instance, you do use guns, and there is a system in game that lets you pause time to target specific parts or your target’s body, (i.e. you could shoot them in the leg from far away to cripple their leg making them walk/run slower or target their head to get the job done faster). There are levels in the game, too. With each level you choose an attribute to increase (i.e.- explosives, small guns, big guns, barter, etc.). You also choose a new perk each level, giving you a new ability or increasing the chances for the perk to happen. For instance, there is a perk called “Bloody Mess”. With this perk there is a chance for your target to “explode” when you shoot them, you could shoot them in the leg, and their head could fall off, too.

This is defiantly not a children’s game. There is language (and lots of it =P) and plenty of blood.  The enemies you find can very from a vicious dog to a super mutant.  The game also has a “free dialogue” (that’s what I call it) system making the outcome of every conversation up to you. Overall, the game is loads of fun and there is SOOO much to do. If you focus on the primary quests you could finish the whole game in about 4 or 5 days, depending on how much you play, but there are side quests that will give some nice rewards and experience.

If you have not played the game don’t say it sucks and if you have, comment away =D.

-James

Call of Duty 4 vs. Halo 3

This week is Halo 3 vs. CoD4.  I will start off with the basics of each game.  They are both single-player and multi-player.  They can both be played online via Xbox live, or Playstation Network.  The are both FPS’s (first person shooter), but Halo is a lot more fast-paced; you have to be a lot more on your feet when playing Halo.  Both require a good bit of hand-eye coordination. CoD is not as fast but is more realistic. In CoD you play in “modern” times while in Halo you play in more of a futuristic time period.  I’ll be talking more about the online play of the game more than the single player simply because I have done a lot more online play than single player. Plus there isn’t much to talk about on single player.

Now for more on CoD4. CoD4 is for the Ps3 and the Xbox 360.  As I said it is more of a modern type of warfare, meaning that guns are real and you die pretty quickly depending on the gun that is shooting you.  The single-player campain is of pretty good size, it took me about 3 or 4 days to beat the whole thing, but i played a lot.  In the campaign you play as the Marines and the S.A.S. (British Special Forces).  You are trying to stop a warlord in the Middle East and the “bad russians”.  The story line is pretty simple and fun. Online is a whole different story.  Online you will be playing against either a lot of people or only you against one other player, depending on the type of game you play. Each time you kill an enemy, win, or lose a round, you get experience points (XP).  Of course you get more if you win but either way you get some XP.   With XP you get promotions, and each promotion unlocks new guns and challenges for you to do/use online.  Challenges grant you XP just for completing them, some only give a little bit, but others will be very rewarding, giving much more XP.  Some challenges are fun to complete.  For instance there is one that tells you to hold a grenade in your hand, with the pin out, and keeping holding it until you kill yourself and an enemy next to you.  Then there are others that just require lots of kills with a certain gun.  Once you reach the highest rank (Commander, 55), you have the chance to prestige or stay your rank.  If you choose to prestige than it starts you all over back to the first rank (private, 1).  You may think, “why would I do that?”, but sometimes you just have to start again fresh, and it gives you something to work from again (to keep you playing =P).

Halo 3…  In Halo 3 you play as Master Chief, or Spartan 117, in a fight against the hordes of the covenant forces (aliens, more or less). This game takes place in the far future, where we have communication with aliens and space ships that can fly across the universe (I know that sounds kind of dumb, but it is done in a cool way).  The single player campaign is really fun, just like in CoD, but I know multi-player better.  Halo is for the Xbox 360 ONLY.  Online you can play as a Spartan or an Elite (one of the covenant “species”). Neither is any better than the other unless you are using a sniper rife; than for some, one is easier for head shots than the other.  As I said earlier, Halo is much more fast-paced. By this I mean there is a lot more moving around and jumping. You can jump like 7 feet in the air to get around people or to get to a higher area.  There are ranks in Halo like in CoD, but there is no prestige, and ranking up, I think, is a little harder.  I’m not sure what the highest rank is =/.  Ranking up in Halo gives you different armor types, but there are no significant differences between each armor other than that some look cooler than others. Since it is for the Xbox 360, the achievements don’t give you XP. Instead, if you complete every achievement you unlock a special armor item, a sword [Katana]. You can not use this sword in the game, but it looks awsome!

As always, which ever is better is up to you, and if you have any comments or want to add anything i missed feel free to comment. And if you have NOT played both games than don’t say one is better than the other. How would you know? Feel free to comment on the game you DO play.

-James

World of Warcraft vs. Guild Wars

Well as you all know world of warcraft (WoW) is a much more known MMO than guild wars (GW).  Now whenever I review a game or do something like this (compare two games or game systems), remember: how much someone likes a game is completely up to that person.  So no matter what I say, it is up to you which you think is better.

I’ll start with just comparing the two games.  WoW is $15 a month, while GW free as long as you have an internet connection.  The maximum level in WoW is 80, which means more gaming time and things to do.  The level cap in GW is only 20, BUT the game’s leveling is way different.  For instance, the time it takes you to get to level 20 in GW is about the same amount of time it would take you to get to level 55ish in WoW.  WoW is also kind of cartoony, GW isn’t as cartoony.  What I mean by this is that WoW is better to look at for a younger person unlike GW where an older (late teens) person might find more entertaining/interesting.  WoW is also a little more user friendly,  GW has more sophisticated controls.  You still use the number keys to use most of you skills and abilities in both games, but the movement in GW is way different than WoW.  In GW you can only have 8 skills on your action bars, in WoW you have 5 action bars with about 12 buttons per bar, so GW takes more thinking about what skills you actually need, unlike in WoW where its basically just put every skill you have somewhere on any of you action bars.  For PvP and PvE  they are both really fun.  WoW has world PvP, where you go out to some places and are able to attack the enemy, but in GW its mostly arena based.  In GW you have your regular PvP (arena), guild vs. guild, and hall of heroes.  WoW just has battle grounds and world PvP.  In GW, if you are in a wealthy enough guild, you can get a guild hall, where the GvG battles take place.  If you don’t have a hall, then you will be the team attacking another guilds hall. Also, there is the Hall of Heroes, which is for the people who like to take their PvP to the next level and go against people in tournaments and face off with people from different countries even.  WoW has the same thing, but its done a lot differently than in GW.

Now I’ll go more into WoW.  WoW is equally balanced between solo play and multi-player.  There are instances where you need a group to go though (unless you’re high enough level to solo it).  To solo it you need to be a much higher level than the enemies inside.  Most quests in WoW are very easely soloed.  When making you character, you have wide variety of different choices.  There are Dwarfs, Humans, Night Elves, Drainei, and Gnomes (The Alliance), and Tauren, Orc, Troll, Undead, and Blood Elves (The Horde).  PvP is based off The Alliance fighting The Horde.  Also, there are different classes each race can be, but not all races can be each class (i.e. there are no Tauren rogues).  There are the Warriors, Warlocks, Mages, Priests, Rogues, Shamans, Death Knights, Druids, Paladins, and Hunters.  Each class has a unique set of skills for fighting other players and others that are better for soloing.  There are also talent points you will get every level starting at level 10.  These talent points are spent on upgrades for your skills.  Each class has three different specs that focus on different skills.  You can only play the Blood Elves and Drainei if you have the expansion, World of Warcraft: The Burning Crusade, and can only play Death Knights if you get the other expansion, Wrath of the Lich King.

Now time for GW.  In GW, you can choose between a warrior, elementalist, monk, dervish, ranger, mesmer, necromancer, ritualist, assassain, and paragon.  You can only play the assassin and ritualist if you get the expansion Guild Wars: Factions, and can only get to play a dervish and paragon if you get the other expansion, Guild Wars: Nightfall.  In Guild Wars, you choose between one of the classes to play, there is only one race (human) but each class has a different way of movement and posture.  Once you get to level 3 or 4 you get to choose a second class to be your sub-class.  Some class mixes are better than others at certain things.  Some hybrids are better for PvP and others for PvE (Player V.S. Environment).  But just like WoW, different skills are better than others for PvP and PvE (that’s with any MMO).  Once you have your classes chosen, than your adventure with your friends or henchmen (I’ll talk about that in a second).  Upon becoming a level 20, you will have learned your classes well and will know the weaknesses and advantages.  At level 20 there is still a lot to do.  Instead of “instances” in WoW, GW has “missions,” which are basically the same, but can be a little easier than WoW’s instances.  The world is HUGE with plenty to discover.  There are lots of little towns, cities, and regions in GW, each city with new armor and/or weapons to buy.  If you choose to play more solo, there are henchmen you can “hire” to be in your group.  The henchmen will take some of the gold (money) that an enemy drops, but it is the same amount as if you have actual people, but you get all the items that drop.

I have played both games.  I own a level 80 dwarf paladin in WoW, and a level 20 warrior/ranger in GW.  I am currently no longer playing WoW, but I am playing GW.  From personal experiance, I can say that both games are loads of fun and can (and most likely will) keep you entertained for hours on end.  I say that from experience.  It is still all a matter of opinion which game you like more.  If you have played one but not the other, please don’t be saying the one is better than the other because you have never played the other, because… how would you know?  But if you have played both, feel free to say which you think is better and mention something you liked about one of the games that I might have missed.  I know I didn’t talk much about the game play but thats because I’m talking about the basics of each game, not which is better.  That part is up to you.

-James

Powered by WordPress and Motion by 85ideas.